Roberts Investigative Services

ABA Compliance & Service Verification

· Roberts Investigative Services

The Truth in the Room: Objective Evidence for Autism Service Integrity

The Bridge to Accountability: Restoring Integrity in ASD Services

Providers and families may approach the same records with different concerns. A useful review begins by defining the service, period and source that can answer the factual question.

Bridging the Gap: A Neutral Source of Truth

ASD service disputes often mix clinical judgment, billing rules, education law and factual questions about what occurred. Those issues should be separated before anyone claims misconduct or noncompliance.

Roberts Investigative Services can compare authorized records, timelines and first-hand information and report discrepancies. We are not a clinical reviewer, regulator, court or guarantor of admissibility. Where legal privilege matters, counsel should retain and direct the investigator.

For the Business

Ensure compliance, mitigate billing risks, and protect your license with Forensic Audits.

Risk Management

For the Guardian

Verify that services are delivered as promised and secure your loved one's legal rights.

Service Verification

Navigating the Visibility Gap: Homes and Public Settings

The location of the service delivery dictates the investigative methodology. We navigate the minefield of privacy laws to ensure evidence is captured legally and ethically.

In-Home Investigation: The Forensic Audit

While Florida’s privacy laws make covert in-home recording a legal risk, we solve the visibility problem through forensic precision. We uncover the direct gap between billed hours and actual clinical records to expose billing errors while fully respecting the privacy of your home.

Public Settings: Field Compliance Verification

When services occur in public parks, community centers, or school playgrounds, we conduct Field Compliance Verification. Because there is no "Reasonable Expectation of Privacy" in these spaces, we can legally document staff engagement and safety protocols via video.

Separating four questions that get conflated

Most ABA service disputes arrive as a single grievance and have to be broken into parts before anyone can answer anything:

  • Did the session occur? A factual question. Records, logs, attendance and observation can address it.
  • Was it delivered as authorized? Partly factual — duration, setting, staff assignment — and partly a matter of what the authorization required.
  • Was it clinically appropriate? Not a factual question in this sense. This needs a qualified clinical reviewer.
  • Does any shortfall have legal consequences? For counsel, an advocate, or a regulator.

An investigator can answer the first and contribute to the second. Presenting an opinion on the third or fourth is outside the discipline, and a report that blurs them is less useful to every reader — because none of them can tell which parts rest on evidence.

Why both sides benefit from the same method

A provider facing an allegation and a family raising one usually want opposite outcomes but need the identical thing: a sourced account of what the records show. A finding that reconciles protects a provider far more credibly than an internal assurance. A finding that does not gives a family something concrete to take to counsel instead of a conviction.

This is why the work is scoped as fact-finding rather than advocacy. An investigator retained to prove a predetermined conclusion produces material that collapses the first time it is examined.

Working through counsel

Where litigation or a due-process filing is contemplated, ask counsel whether to retain the investigator through the firm. Work-product protection depends on the relationship, the purpose and the jurisdiction — it is not automatic, and engaging through counsel does not make every resulting document non-discoverable. Anyone describing it as a guaranteed shield is overstating it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it legal to put a "nanny cam" in my child's therapy session?
In Florida, it is a felony to record audio without consent (F.S. 934.03). Illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible and can destroy your legal case. We provide legal alternatives through forensic data analysis and public-setting observation.
How does forensic auditing protect my ABA business?
By identifying billing irregularities like "cloned notes" or "upcoding" early, you demonstrate "due diligence". This functions as a proactive Internal Affairs unit, allowing you to self-correct before federal auditors intervene.

Discuss a verification question

Bring the service authorization, the period in question, the records you can authorize access to, and the specific decision you are trying to make. We will explain what can be established, what cannot, and which questions need a clinician, an advocate or an attorney instead.

Call: +1-888-772-7894

Discuss your situation

If any of this sounds familiar, we offer ABA service verification, an independent compliance review and providers in St. Lucie County.

Private · No Obligation

Find out whether an investigation can help.

Describe the question you need answered. A licensed investigator will explain what can be done legally, what information would help and what the likely scope will be.